Metric Definition
Track from
Quality score
Quality score is a diagnostic metric in Google Ads that rates the quality and relevance of your keywords, ads, and landing pages on a scale of 1 to 10. It directly influences your ad rank and cost per click, making it one of the most important factors in paid search efficiency.
7 min read
What is quality score?
Quality score is Google Ads' rating of the overall quality and relevance of your keywords, ad copy, and landing pages. It is reported as a number from 1 (worst) to 10 (best) at the keyword level and is updated each time a keyword is eligible for an auction.
Quality score matters because it is a direct input to the ad auction. Ad rank, which determines whether your ad is shown and in what position, is calculated as your bid multiplied by your quality score (simplified). This means a keyword with a quality score of 8 and a bid of 2 pounds can outrank a competitor bidding 4 pounds with a quality score of 3. Higher quality scores let you achieve better positions at lower costs.
The financial impact is significant. Keywords with above-average quality scores pay less per click than the benchmark, sometimes 30% to 50% less. Keywords with below-average quality scores pay a premium, sometimes 50% to 400% more. Over an entire account, the difference between average and above-average quality scores can represent thousands of pounds in monthly savings.
Quality score is composed of three sub-components, each rated as below average, average, or above average: expected click-through rate (how likely users are to click your ad), ad relevance (how closely your ad matches the intent behind the search query), and landing page experience (how useful and relevant your landing page is to someone who clicked the ad).
Quality score is not just a diagnostic. It directly determines what you pay per click. Improving quality score from 5 to 8 on your top keywords can reduce cost per click by 30% or more, producing the same traffic at significantly lower spend.
Quality score components
Quality score is built from three distinct components. Understanding each one is essential for targeted improvement because a score of 5 can result from very different underlying problems.
| Component | What it measures | How to improve it |
|---|---|---|
| Expected click-through rate | How likely your ad is to be clicked when shown, relative to other ads for the same query | Write compelling headlines, use strong calls-to-action, include keywords in ad copy, test multiple ad variations |
| Ad relevance | How closely your ad copy matches the intent behind the search query | Organise keywords into tightly themed ad groups, write ad copy that directly addresses each keyword group, avoid broad ad groups with generic copy |
| Landing page experience | How useful, relevant, and easy to navigate your landing page is for someone who clicked the ad | Ensure landing page content matches ad promise, improve page load speed, make the page mobile-friendly, provide clear navigation and trust signals |
Each component is rated as below average, average, or above average relative to other advertisers competing for the same keywords. An "average" rating means you are performing at the median. "Above average" means you are outperforming most competitors on that dimension.
The most impactful component to improve depends on where you are weakest. A keyword with above-average ad relevance and landing page experience but below-average expected CTR has a specific, actionable problem: the ad copy is not compelling enough. A keyword with strong CTR but poor landing page experience needs a landing page redesign, not ad copy changes.
Google also uses a real-time auction quality score that may differ from the reported quality score. The reported score is a historical aggregate; the auction score incorporates real-time signals like device, location, time of day, and query context. This means the reported quality score is a useful directional indicator, but the actual cost and position in any given auction may vary.
Quality score in a metric tree
Quality score influences ad rank, which in turn determines impression share and cost per click. In a metric tree, it connects to both the volume and efficiency of paid search.
The tree reveals quality score's dual impact. First, it reduces cost per click because higher quality scores require lower bids to achieve the same ad rank. Second, it increases impression share because higher ad rank wins more auctions, capturing more of the available search volume.
This creates a compounding effect that makes quality score one of the highest-leverage metrics in paid search. Improving quality score simultaneously reduces the cost of each click and increases the number of clicks you receive. No other single metric delivers this dual benefit.
Quality score benchmarks
| Score range | Rating | Typical CPC impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 to 3 | Poor | Paying 50% to 400% above benchmark CPC. These keywords need immediate attention or pausing. |
| 4 to 5 | Below average | Paying 25% to 50% above benchmark. Targeted improvements to the weakest component can lift these quickly. |
| 6 | Average | Paying roughly benchmark CPC. The baseline, not the target. |
| 7 to 8 | Above average | Paying 15% to 30% below benchmark CPC. Strong performance; optimise incrementally. |
| 9 to 10 | Excellent | Paying 30% to 50% below benchmark CPC. Typically only achievable on branded keywords or very tightly themed ad groups. |
| Keyword type | Typical quality score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Branded keywords | 8 to 10 | Your brand name has inherent relevance. Scores below 8 indicate a problem. |
| High-intent commercial keywords | 6 to 8 | Well-structured campaigns with relevant landing pages achieve this. |
| Broad informational keywords | 4 to 6 | Harder to match intent precisely. Tighter ad group themes help. |
| Competitor brand keywords | 3 to 5 | Low relevance by nature. Expected but monitor CPA closely. |
How to improve quality score
- 1
Structure ad groups around tight keyword themes
The foundation of quality score is relevance. Group closely related keywords into small, focused ad groups so you can write ad copy that directly addresses the intent behind each keyword cluster. An ad group with 5 to 10 tightly themed keywords will always outperform one with 50 loosely related terms.
- 2
Write ad copy that mirrors keyword intent
Include the primary keyword or a close variant in the headline. Address the specific need the searcher has. If the keyword is "project management software for remote teams," the ad should address remote team project management specifically, not generic software benefits.
- 3
Build dedicated landing pages per ad group
Landing page experience improves when the page content matches the ad promise. A searcher who clicks an ad about "remote team project management" should land on a page about that topic, not a generic homepage. Create landing page variants for your highest-spend ad groups.
- 4
Improve landing page speed and usability
Page load speed, mobile responsiveness, clear navigation, and above-the-fold relevance all contribute to landing page experience. Run PageSpeed Insights on your top landing pages and address the recommendations.
- 5
Test ad variations to improve expected CTR
Run responsive search ads with multiple headline and description options. Google will optimise toward the combinations that generate the highest CTR, which directly improves expected CTR and therefore quality score.
Common mistakes with quality score
Obsessing over score rather than outcomes
Quality score is a means to lower costs and better positions, not an end in itself. A keyword with a quality score of 5 that converts profitably is more valuable than a keyword with a quality score of 9 that generates no revenue.
Using broad ad groups with generic copy
Stuffing dozens of loosely related keywords into a single ad group guarantees poor ad relevance. The ad copy cannot be relevant to all queries when the queries span different intents.
Ignoring landing page experience
Many advertisers focus solely on ad copy and bids while neglecting landing pages. Landing page experience is one-third of the quality score and often the most neglected component.
Expecting quick changes
Quality score is based on historical performance data. Improvements to ad copy and landing pages take time to reflect in the reported score. Measure progress over weeks, not days.
Related metrics
Cost Per Click
CPC
Marketing MetricsMetric Definition
CPC = Total Ad Spend / Total Clicks
Cost per click measures the average price you pay each time a user clicks on your ad. It is the foundational pricing metric for pay-per-click advertising and a critical input to [Customer Acquisition Cost](/glossary/saas-metrics/customer-acquisition-cost), connecting ad spend directly to traffic volume.
Click-Through Rate
CTR
Marketing MetricsMetric Definition
CTR = (Clicks / Impressions) × 100
Click-through rate measures the percentage of people who click on a link, ad, or call-to-action after seeing it. It is one of the most fundamental engagement metrics in digital marketing, connecting impressions to action and serving as an early indicator of campaign relevance and audience targeting quality.
Impression Share
IS
Marketing MetricsMetric Definition
Impression Share = (Impressions Received / Total Eligible Impressions) × 100
Impression share measures the percentage of eligible impressions your ads actually received. It tells you how much of the available opportunity you are capturing and, critically, how much you are missing due to budget constraints or ad rank limitations.
Return on Ad Spend
ROAS
Marketing MetricsMetric Definition
ROAS = Revenue from Ads / Ad Spend
Return on ad spend measures the revenue generated for every pound spent on advertising. It is the primary profitability metric for paid media, telling you whether your ad campaigns are generating more revenue than they cost and by how much.
See how quality score impacts your entire paid search funnel
Build a metric tree that connects quality score to cost per click, impression share, and return on ad spend so you can quantify the savings from every point of improvement.